El Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores (MOFA) está planeando un centro para organizaciones no gubernamentales (ONG) internacionales con el fin de atraer a más grupos para que establezcan oficinas y convertir a Taiwán en un centro clave para su trabajo en la región, según declaró el ministro de Asuntos Exteriores, Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), en el Foro de Líderes de ONG en Taipéi.
El foro, con el tema “Diplomacia Integrada en Acción: Experiencias, Logros y Perspectivas de las ONG”, fue el primer evento importante organizado por el ministerio este año, afirmó Lin.
El ministro de Asuntos Exteriores afirmó que la agencia busca acercar a Taiwán al mundo a través del plan, que incluye una estrategia de “diplomacia integrada”.
El evento brindó una oportunidad para revisar los logros de las ONG y su trabajo con el gobierno, así como para profundizar la cooperación público-privada, añadió. El ministerio ha estado promoviendo la “diplomacia basada en valores”, en consonancia con las políticas del presidente William Lai (賴清德), afirmó.
“El ministerio se esfuerza por acercar a Taiwán al mundo”, afirmó Lin, añadiendo que ha apoyado este objetivo integrando la “diplomacia basada en valores, la diplomacia económica y la diplomacia de alianzas” en una estrategia integral de “diplomacia integrada”.
Fuente: https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2026/01/08/2003850236
TAIWAN: MINISTRY OUTLINES PLAN FOR INGO CENTER
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) is planning a center for international non-governmental organizations (NGO) to attract more groups to set up offices and make Taiwan a critical hub for their work in the region, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) told the NGO Leaders Forum in Taipei.
The forum, themed “Integrated Diplomacy in Action: NGO Experiences, Achievements and Outlook,” was the first major event held by the ministry this year, Lin said.
The event was an opportunity to review the achievements of NGOs and their work with the government, as well as a means to deepen public-private cooperation, he said.
The foreign minister said the agency seeks to bring ‘Taiwan closer to the world’ through the plan, which has an ‘integrated diplomacy’ strategy
The ministry has been promoting “values-based diplomacy” in line with President William Lai’s (賴清德) policies, he said.
“The ministry is striving to bring Taiwan closer to the world,” Lin said, adding that he has supported the objective by integrating “values-based diplomacy, economic diplomacy and alliance diplomacy” into a comprehensive “integrated diplomacy” strategy.
“Through the promotion of NGO diplomacy, Taiwan would translate values-based diplomacy — with its focus on democracy, freedom and human rights — into visible, credible and concrete cooperative initiatives,” he said.
“Under the framework of integrated diplomacy, the role of NGOs would also evolve, as they are more than participants in policy initiatives, being essential partners that codesign and coimplement initiatives and expand Taiwan’s international influence,” he said.
NGOs and governments are providing integrated support for children affected by war in Kyiv, Lin said, citing an example he learned about while attending a ceremony in Warsaw in September last year to witness the signing of a memorandum of understanding.
“Likewise, Taiwan can build platforms to boost international cooperation, accumulate trust and consolidate its indispensable role as a responsible member of the global civil society,” he said.
“Over the past year, the ministry’s work with domestic and international NGOs has continued to show that Taiwan has an important role to play as an enabler of cooperation and a trusted partner in international society,” he said.
Diplomacy is about long-term commitment, sustained dialogue and partnerships that provide mutual support at critical moments, he said, adding that this is why international NGOs are deepening ties with Taiwan and establishing bases here.
“The ministry plans to launch an international NGO center in Taipei and we believe Taiwan can serve as a critical hub for their activities throughout the Indo-Pacific region,” he said.
Civil society in Taiwan has abundant resources, while NGOs in the nation are vibrant and dynamic, with experience in international affairs and professionalism, so they are an indispensable force in connecting Taiwan with the world, he said.
Marco Chiesara, president of Italian humanitarian group WeWorld, told the forum that Taiwan’s public and private sectors provide essential support for children affected by the war in Ukraine.
“Partnerships like the one with Taiwan’s MOFA and the Taiwan Fund for Children and Families are so vital,” Chiesara said in his keynote speech. “They turn pledges into programs and concerns into concrete change.”
The aid allowed WeWorld to “keep child-friendly spaces open, keep heaters running … and keep hopes alive,” he said.
“Children cannot wait. They cannot wait for a ceasefire to find walls, for a construction budget to find a classroom or for the next election to find psychosocial care. They need us now,” he said.
WeWorld’s most recent collaboration with Taiwan in Ukraine involved a project supporting foster families and children’s mental health in Kyiv, Chiesara said.
WeWorld, the Taiwan Fund for Children and Families, and the ministry previously worked in other conflict-affected countries such as Syria and Afghanistan following major earthquakes there, he added.
LA PROHIBICIÓN CHINA DE EXPORTAR PRODUCTOS DE DOBLE USO A JAPÓN, UNA ESCALADA DECISIVA
Las restricciones a la exportación impuestas por China el martes a las mercancías con destino a Japón podrían poner en riesgo los flujos comerciales establecidos, ya que la lista de productos de doble uso potencialmente cubiertos por la prohibición es amplia y diversa.
Esta medida es la última de una serie de medidas de escalada tras las declaraciones del primer ministro Sanae Takaichi el año pasado sobre Taiwán. En respuesta a estas declaraciones, en las que Takaichi sugirió que una respuesta militar podría justificarse si la isla es atacada, China ha instado a sus ciudadanos a evitar viajar a Japón y ha suspendido las importaciones de productos del mar japoneses.
Su prohibición de exportar a Japón productos de doble uso (productos con uso militar y civil) es potencialmente mucho más perjudicial que las medidas de represalia anteriores. La lista de control de exportaciones de doble uso de China, que se actualizó recientemente, incluye más de 800 artículos en 10 categorías e incluye no solo productos, componentes y tecnologías clave con usos y aplicaciones militares obvios (productos químicos, minerales, productos electrónicos, sensores, sistemas de navegación, software y tecnologías aeroespaciales), sino también una serie de productos de rutina que están más estrechamente asociados con esfuerzos comerciales y uso del consumidor, incluidas cámaras de alta velocidad.
Fuente: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/business/2026/01/07/economy/china-dual-use/
CHINA’S DUAL-USE EXPORT BAN ON JAPAN A DECISIVE ESCALATION
Export restrictions put into place by China on Tuesday on goods bound for Japan could put established trade flows at risk, as the list of dual-use products potentially covered by the ban is wide ranging and diverse.
The move is the latest in a series of escalatory measures following remarks by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi last year on Taiwan. In response to the comments, in which Takaichi suggested that a military response might be warranted if the island is attacked, China has encouraged its citizens to avoid travel to Japan, and it has halted imports of Japanese seafood.
Its ban on the export to Japan of dual-use items — products that have military and civilian use — is potentially far more damaging than earlier retaliatory measures.
China’s dual-use export control list, which was recently updated, features more than 800 items in 10 categories and includes not only key products, components and technologies with obvious military uses and applications — chemicals, minerals, electronics, sensors, navigation systems, software and aerospace technologies — but also a host of routine products that are more closely associated with commercial endeavors and consumer use, including high-speed cameras.
“Exports of all dual-use items to Japanese military end users, for military purposes, or to any other end uses that would help enhance Japan’s military capabilities, are prohibited,” China’s Ministry of Commerce said.
Japan responded swiftly to the policy shift in China, with the government formally protesting the move and industry promising a quick response.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara called the measure “absolutely unacceptable,” while the Japanese Chamber of Commerce in China said that it would file a petition with the Chinese government if the activities of Japanese companies are hindered.
One of the key items on the list is rare earths.
China has a near monopoly on extracting and refining some of the materials in this category. Takahide Kiuchi, executive economist at Nomura Research Institute, estimates a ¥2.6 trillion ($16 billion) decline in production and economic loss if the restrictions on rare-earth exports alone go on for a full year. This would result in an annual gross domestic product drop of 0.43%, according to his estimates.
Rare earths are used in precision-guided weapons and satellite and stealth technologies, unmanned vehicles and advanced communications systems. They are of strategic importance for the functionality of modern and increasingly interconnected armed forces. They are also used in smartphones, computer hard drives, MRI machines, batteries and electric vehicle motors.
Dual-use export restrictions are not uncommon and have been used by many countries, Japan included, for a variety of reasons. The United States has prohibited China from acquiring advanced semiconductors, chipmaking equipment and specialized alloy. Japan has prohibited the export of certain technologies and advanced materials.
China has repeatedly imposed export controls, including restrictions on the export of rare earths to Japan in 2010 during a territorial dispute over the Senkaku Islands, which China claims.
Most recently, following trade talks with the United States, Beijing suspended a ban on gallium and germanium, which are used in semiconductors, and on antimony and graphite, which are used in munitions and batteries.
Some analysts wonder whether the dual-use export ban will be effective.
Japan has reduced its dependency on Chinese rare earths from over 90% to 60% by diversifying supply, while China risks being subject to retaliatory measures by Japan and being denied access to key materials and technologies it needs.
“If China goes too far, its own companies would take a serious hit,” said Ke Long, an economist at The Tokyo Foundation. “If these measures don’t work as China expects, then it simply has no cards left to play.”
In Tokyo on Wednesday, stocks fell in part on concerns about the dual-use ban announced by China the previous day. The Nikkei 225 stock index fell 1.06%, and companies that might need rare earths for their businesses declined more than the index. Toyota fell 2.74% and Advantest was down 4.41%.
“The risk of a widespread impact on Japan’s automobile and electronics industries is expected to manifest should export restrictions, including on rare earths, be imposed,” UBS said in a report issued Tuesday.
Uncertainty was also evident in the day following the export restriction announcement. How and to what extent China will implement the dual-use ban is not at all clear, and the range of possibilities go from barely noticeable adjustments in trade flows to factories in Japan shutting down due to the lack of components and materials.
“The Chinese like to use the word ‘pocket’ — something you can put anything into,” The Tokyo Foundation’s Ke said, adding that that’s exactly what was done this time.
INDIA HABRÍA REALIZADO EL LANZAMIENTO DE UN MISIL BALÍSTICO K-4 DESDE UNO DE SUS NUEVOS SUBMARINOS NUCLEARES CLASE ARIHANT
Acorde ha sido informado por medios de comunicación locales, la India habría llevado a cabo el lanzamiento de un misil balístico K-4 desde uno de sus nuevos submarinos nucleares clase Arihant, mas específicamente desde aquel que porta el nombre INS Arighaat. Particularmente, si bien se carece de una confirmación oficial por parte del Ministerio de Defensa del país, los reportes indican que el hecho se habría producido en la Bahía de Bengala y bajo la supervisión del Comando de Fuerzas Estratégicas que nuclea efectivos de las tres diferentes ramas de las Fuerzas Armadas.
Ampliando en detalles, los analistas indios destacaron que la oportunidad sirvió para poner a prueba el funcionamiento del misil con alcance situado en torno a los 3.500 kilómetros impulsado por combustible sólido, caracterizado además por contar con la posibilidad de ser equipado con una carga nuclear de hasta dos toneladas. A fechas actuales, Nueva Delhi estaría realizando diferentes análisis en profundidad de los datos obtenidos, buscando certificar si el sistema cumplió con todos los objetivos de la misión correctamente.
Ha de mencionarse, sin embargo, que el reciente lanzamiento habría tenido una serie de demoras y reprogramaciones; lo que indicaría preocupaciones por la creciente presencia de buques de investigación chinos desplegados en el Índico según se reporta. En detalle, se recoge que a principios de este mes el gobierno indio emitió avisos para notificar al tráfico civil naval y aéreo sobre la realización de las pruebas, delimitando inicialmente una zona de peligro de unos 3.500 kilómetros. Posteriormente, se dio a conocer que el testeo sería demorado hasta el día 11 de este mes, seguido de un tercer aviso que estipulaba su concreción entre el 17 y el 20. El cuarto y último aviso fue aquel que demoró las pruebas al período comprendido entre el 22 y el 24 de diciembre.
Cabe recordar en este sentido, que de cara a la meta de alcanzar la Capacidad Operativa Plena, es necesario que el misil K-4 supere un amplio abanico de testeos con éxito; lo que implica la realización de disparos de prueba como el hasta ahora aludido. En este sentido, cabe recordar que dicho armamento habría sido probado por primera vez desde un submarino durante el mes de noviembre del 2024, ocasión en la que también se vio involucrado el propio INS Arighaat; submarino que como tal había sido puesto en servicio durante el mes agosto de ese mismo año.
Por otra parte, resulta importante destacar también que la India no solo está trabajando en el desarrollo de este tipo de misiles, sino que también en la conformación de la flota de submarinos clase Arihant que equipará a su Armada. Tal y como hemos reportado a comienzos del mes en curso, el país reveló que está a la espera de poder incorporar al servicio al INS Aridhaman durante el primer trimestre del próximo año, configurándose como el tercero de su tipo en manos de la citada institución. A largo plazo, la conformación de esta flota junto al desarrollo de misiles balísticos es visto por los estrategas indios como un paso clave para reforzar las capacidades de ataque de represalia en caso de conflicto.
Si a su vez colocamos la lente mas allá del ámbito naval, es menester resaltar que la India ha logrado concretar lanzamientos de su nuevo misil balístico Agni-5 en el mes de agosto, ocasión en la que se validaron todos los parámetros técnicos y operativos previstos del mismo en el Campo de Pruebas Integrado en Chandipur. Hacia finales de septiembre, otro lanzamiento se concretó haciendo uso de los misiles Agni-Prime desde un sistema de lanzamiento ferroviario, lo que oportunamente fue destacado como un salto de capacidades que dotaría de mayor flexibilidad a la disuasión nuclear del país. En conjunto, ello refleja los avances de Nueva Delhi en la materia, siendo la intención de sus principales autoridades el poder cerrar la brecha existente en la actualidad con las mayores potencias nucleares del mundo.
INDIA REPORTEDLY LAUNCHED A K-4 BALLISTIC MISSILE FROM ONE OF ITS NEW ARIHANT CLASS NUCLEAR SUBMARINES
According to local media reports, India reportedly launched a K-4 ballistic missile from one of its new Arihant-class nuclear submarines, specifically the INS Arighaat. While there is no official confirmation from the Ministry of Defense, reports indicate that the launch took place in the Bay of Bengal under the supervision of the Strategic Forces Command, which integrates personnel from all three branches of the armed forces.
Expanding on the details, Indian analysts highlighted that the launch served to test the missile’s performance. The missile has a range of approximately 3,500 kilometers, is powered by solid fuel, and can be equipped with a nuclear warhead of up to two tons. Currently, New Delhi is reportedly conducting various in-depth analyses of the data obtained, seeking to certify whether the system successfully met all the mission objectives.
Published twice per week by Nuevo Poder. Articles and op-eds focusing on geopolitical issues around Indo-Pacific area
Editor: LW, senior fellow of REDCAEM and CESCOS
Submit contributions (that can be read with ease and pleasure), to ilwb@email.cz